( 1 ) THE petitioner has challenged the impugned award dated 19. 2. 2000 published on 2. 2. 2001 passed by Labour Court Agra holding that the termination of the workman- Vinod Kumarrespondent no. 2 is illegal.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner-institution is recognized private school which receives grant-in- aid from the State Government. It imparts education to children upto Intermediate classes. Respondent No. 2 was appointed on 14. 11. 1985 as temporary safai karmachari in the institution.

( 3 ) IT is submitted that respondent No. 2 did not perform his work regularly and properly and did not improve his conduct as such a show cause notice dated 14. 11. 1986 was issued to him to show as to why he be not suspended for dereliction of duty. No reply was given by respondent no. 2 to the show cause notice and he also did not improve his work and conduct. He was thereafter placed under suspension vide order dated 4. 3. 1987 vide annexure 4 to the writ petition. It is further submitted that disciplinary proceedings were initiated and respondent No. 2 admitted his guilt vide letters dated 6. 3. 87 and 10. 3. 87 appended as Annexures 5 a