SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 543

Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Mehra Trust – Respondent


Advocates:
Shambhoo Chopra,

( 1 ) THE Tribunal, Allahabad has referred the following question of law under Section 256 (1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for opinion to this Court :

"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding the assessee trust to be a valid one in spite of the fact that the trust, deed did not provide for the eventuality of both the minor beneficiaries expiring before attaining majority ?"

( 2 ) THE reference relates to the asst. yr. 1983-84.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : the respondent is a trust which had filed its return of income for the first time for the asst. yr. 1983-84 on 20th Jan. , 1986 declaring total income of Rs. 9,105. The return was filed in the status of AOP. The trust was created in the form of a letter dt. 29th March, 1978 which was written by km. Ranjana Mehra to M/s Mehra Hosiery Factory Sales, Lucknow, whereby a sum of Rs. 8,900 was settled in trust in favour of two minor girls as beneficiaries. In the first paragraph of the letter, it was stated that on both the minor attaining majority, the trustees should have a right to diss











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top