SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1076

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sunil Ambwani
BEGUM SHANTI TUFAIL AHMAD KHAN
Versus
STATE
Decided On : 12 June 2005
Testamentary Case No. 28 of 1997

Advocates:
Surendra Kumar Mishra,

The main legal point established in the judgment is the invalidity of the will due to the bequest of more than one third of the properties without the consent of other heirs, as per the Indian Succession Act 1925. The judgment also emphasizes the importance of filing for probate within the limitation period as per the Limitation Act 1963.

Headnote:

WILL - Testamentary Case - Indian Succession Act 1925, Limitation Act 1963 - The court discussed the validity of the will, the limitation period for filing a probate, and the legal provisions under the Indian Succession Act and Limitation Act. The court found the will invalid due to the bequest of more than one third of the properties without the consent of other heirs and dismissed the testamentary case.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a testamentary case for grant of probate with a copy of Will executed by the deceased. The deceased claimed to be the owner of properties in multiple cities and bequeathed the entire properties to a son in the family.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the will invalid due to the bequest of more than one third of the properties without the consent of other heirs and dismissed the testamentary case.

Issues: Validity of the will, delay in filing the petition, and the limitation period for filing a probate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the bequest in the will was invalid as it transferred more than one third of the properties without the consent of other heirs. The court also discussed the applicability of the Limitation Act and the obligation to file for probate in a timely manner.

Final Decision: The testamentary case was dismissed with costs to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent.

SUNIL AMBWANI, J.

The plaintiff Sri Jalaluddin son of Badruddin filed this testamentary case on 18-9-1997 for grant of probate with a copy of Will annexed thereto executed by the deceased Begum Shanti Tufail Ahamad Khan wife of late Tufail Ahmad Khan, resident of 18-B Maharani Bagh, New Delhi, who died on 9-10- 1976 leaving behind her alleged Will and Testament dated 23-5-1974 (wrongly mentioned in para 6, 7 and 10 as 23-5-1994 ). In para 11 of the plaint, it is alleged that she had handed over the Will to one Sri Yusuf Ali Khan son of Sri Kamaluddin Khan resident of 60 Jufarabad, Delhi who is also an attesting witness to the Will with instructions to hand it over to the applicant. The said Sri Yusuf Ali Khan in pursuant to instruction handed over the Will to the applicant on 15-7-1997 (after 23 years ).

2. In the Will (Paper No. A-3/16) the deceased claimed to be 60 years old and owner of properties in many cities of India, which she got from her husband, more particularly in Delhi, U. P. , Madhya Pradesh and Haryana including Plot No. 43 and 44 on Returned Road on which House No. 18-B Maharani Bagh New Delhi is built; Shanti Kunj and Dileram Estate in Mussorrie in U. P. , Tasvir Mahal Cinema in Aligarh. Digar properties at Hazratganj, Lucknow and Civil Lines at Allahabad and also at Gwalior in Madhya Pradesh, Garhi Bahrail and Nawab Garhi in District Karnal, Haryana. She bequeathed the entire properties to a son in the family, Jalalludin son of Bahruddin resident of Muzaffarnagar. U. P. related to her as the family grandson (Khandani Chirag ). In this Will she scribed that her husband was a lecturer in Aligarh University and had desired that the property should remain in the family, left by her husband on his death to Jalaluddin, who he expected to follow the traditions of the family. She gave him her full rights to get his name transferred in all the properties. The Will was scribed by Sri Sadhu Ram, Kashmiri Gate, Delhi on 23-5-1974 and was witnessed by Sri Yusuf Ali Khan son of Kamalludin Khan resident of 60 Jafarabad, Delhi and Sri Kitabuddin, Son of Sri Mohd. Nasir Husain, resident of Kairana. Muzaffamagar.

3. Notices were issued on 19-9-1997 to Sri Ruikom Deen son of Sri Badruddin, alleged to be the only surviving next kith and kin. Administrator General, Board of Revenue, U. P. and to be published in the news paper. The advertisement was carried out in amar Ujala" dated 12-11-1997 published from Meerut and hindustan Times published from New Delhi on 13-11-1997. Sri Rukom Deen son of Sri Badruddin appearing through Sri R. K. Upadhaya, Advocate filed his affidavit dated 28-11-1997 stating in para 3 that so far as the Will as executed by Shanti Tufail Ahmad on 23-7-74 is concerned the deponent has nothing to do with the Will as well he has no objections. Affidavit of valuation of assets was filed describing the properties in the State of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Haryana with a total value of Rs. 9 lacs only. In pursuance of directions by this Court the better particulars with full valuation were given by a fresh affidavit of valuation valuing the properties at Rs. 20, 90, 400. 00 only.

4. Objections were filed by Sri Ravi Sikari claiming to be owners of B-18 Maharani Bagh, New Delhi. In these objections dated 15-7- 1998 he denied the title of deceased and claimed that he had acquired the Perpetual Sub Lease dated 31-5-1965 from Maharani Bagh Cooperative Housing Building Society Ltd. which is a registered document and has been paying house tax vide assessment order annexed to his objections. Objections were also filed by Sri Patwant Singh and Smt. Rasil Basu on 17-5-1989 stating that a Muslim could not have given more than one third of her properties by Will under the Muslim Law. The properties bearing No. 11 Amrita Shergil Marg New Delhi was allotted to Sri Tufail Ahamad Khan vide Lease Deed dated 23-12-1939. He sold the properties to Sri Kamla Devi on 13-2-1948, who thereafter sold to Smt. Harnam Kaur on












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top