SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1773

ANJANI KUMAR
Raj Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Oil Selection Board (North) – Respondent


Advocates:
K.P.TIWARI, P.PADIA,

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-plaintiff aggrieved by the order dated 12th January, 2001, passed by the trial court, whereby the trial court rejected the amendment application filed by the petitioner approached the revisional court, who vide order dated 9th August, 2005, dismissed the revision filed by the petitioner, approached this Court by means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, copies whereof are annexed as Annexures-4 and 5, respectively to the writ petition.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

( 3 ) IN short the facts of the present case are that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit in the year 1985 against the respondents-defendants before the trial court. Thereafter in the year 2000, after 15 years from the date of filing of the suit, the petitioner-plaintiff filed an amendment application under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking amendment in the plaint, which was partly allowed by the trial court vide order dated 15th February, 2000. Against the order dated 15th February, 2000, the petitioner-plaintiff preferred a revision before the revisional court and the revisional court vi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top