SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 553

G.P.MATHUR, S.K.JAIN
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF JUSTICE OF HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.SRIVASTAVA, SUNIL AMBWANI

G. P. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing the order dated August 25. 2000 of Honble the Chief Justice appointing an arbitrator under Section 11 (5)of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

( 2 ) M/s. Suristh Tiwary (respondent No. 2) filed a petition under Section 11 of the Act on the grounds, inter alia, that M/s. Border Roads Organisation awarded a contract for supply of earth for construction of Varanasi-Ram Nagar-Mugalsarai Road and an agreement in that connection was executed between the parties on February 5, 1997. Due to rainy season, the work could not be completed within the stipulated period, i. e. , September 27, 1997. The firm had submitted a schedule to complete the work by March 31, 1978. There was a dispute regarding the amount which was to be paid to the firm and accordingly it gave a notice on October 23, 1999 for appointment of an arbitrator but no arbitrator was appointed. It was accordingly prayed that an arbitrator may be appointed under Section 11 of the Act. The Union of India filed a counter-affidavit opposing the prayer for appointment of the arbitrator. The Chief Justice by his order da





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top