R.B.MISRA
U. P. State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
R. B. Misra, J.—Heard Sri Sameer Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M. C. Chaturvedi Additional Chief Standing Counsel along with Sri S. S. Sharma, learned standing counsel for the State.
2. Initially on 5.2.1988 notice was issued, one counsel was engaged for respondent No. 3 who has subsequently been elevated as Hon’ble Judge of this Bench therefore, another notice was issued on 12.11.2003 to engage another counsel in place of earlier counsel for and on behalf of respondent No. 3 and despite notice, no counsel was engaged. In these circumstances the writ petition is disposed of on the available documents.
3. In this petition labour court award dated 2.2.1987 is under challenge. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of the present writ petition are that the respondent No. 3 was appointed as temporary employee as conductor against short term vacancy. On 27.7.1974 and while plying Bus No. 9107 on Chandrawat-Mahoba route, on checking Sri R. P. Srivastava, Assistant Regional Manager, Mahoba along with Sri R. B. Mathur, Junior Foreman, Mahoba found that respondent No. 3 was carrying 28 passengers without tickets and 74 kgs. luggage without booking for whic
(1997) 7 SCC 463 : 1997 SCC (L & S) 1806
2002 (1) AWC 237 (SC) : (2002) 1 LLJ 234
(1983) 2 SCC 442 : 1983 SCC (L & S) 342
(1994) 2 SCC 537 : 1994 SCC (L & S) 687 : (1994) 27 ATC 149
1987 AC 514 : (1987) 1 All ER 940
(1997) 3 SCC 72 : 1997 SCC (L & S) 636 (Para 10).
(1988) 2 SCC 52 : 1988 SCC (L & S) 436 : (1988) 6 ATC 876
(1995) 6 SCC 749 : 1996 SCC (L & S) 80 : (1996) 32 ATC 44
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.