SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 1057

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, S.C.CHAURASIA
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RANNI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anand Mohan for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the claimant respondents. Also perused record.

2. Present appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been preferred against the impugned Award dated 24.7.1998, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (IV-Additional District Judge, Sitapur) in Claim Petition No. 142 of 1995. Brief Facts giving rise to the present controversy are discussed hereinafter.

3. On 10.5.1995, at about 2:00 in the afternoon, one Rajendra Prasad on his way at Hargaon, Sitapur Highway, was crushed from backside by a truck bearing Registration No. UP 76/9055. Rajendra Prasad succumbed to injury at spot. A First Information Report was lodged under Section 302 read with Section 392 IPC. However, later on, police submitted charge-sheet under Section 304-A IPC. Rajendra Prasad was aged about 43 years and was agriculturist having also dairy business. According to claimant respondents the income of the deceased was Rs. 4,000/- per month who left behind him, his widow Smt. Ranni Devi, sons Varun Kumar and Dheeraj and daughters Km. Preeti and Km. Ruchi, mother Smt. Kokila as dependents,

4. A claim petition was filed f



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top