SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2005

A.P.SAHI
ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Santosh Kumar Srivastava and Smt. Alka Srivastava for the Petitioner; Anuj Kumar, C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—This petition questions the correctness of the impugned orders including the order dated 14.1.2008 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer and the order passed by Addl. Collector dated 31.5.2011 affirming the same arising out of summary proceedings of expunging the name of the petitioner from the land in dispute. The ground of challenge is that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice in an administrative capacity and without applying mind to the facts of the case.

2. The claim of the petitioner is that the predecessor in interest of the petitioner namely Smt. Chhotti was the allottee of the land since the year 1973. The land was recorded as “Banjar”. The allotment is sought to be annulled by virtue of a summary order holding that the statutory period of lease has expired and, therefore, the petitioner cannot continue to hold over the land. It has been categorically recorded that the period is 5 years whereas the petitioner has continued for almost more than 3 decades without having any right, title or interest over the land in dispute.

3. Sri Srivastava relying heavily on the judgment in the case of Hari Ram v. Collector, District Sah
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top