SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 673

AMAR SARAN
Pintoo – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Petitioner Counsel:- L.K. Pandey,P.C. Pandey
Respondent Counsel:- Govt. Advocate

Amar Saran,J.

The prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the applicants Pintoo, Ajai and Indal Dhobi in case crime no.34/2002 under Section 302/341 I.P.C. P.S. Saini, district Kaushambi after the bail of the applicants was cancelled by an order dated 29.7.2009 passed by the Additional Session Judge/F.T.C.-2 in S.T.No.243 of 2002.

1. The brief facts of this case were that on 17.1.2002 at about 8 p.m., the informant Ram Raj, his brother Bhairo Prasad, and nephews Suraj Pal and Ram Kripal were going to the west of the village for loading onions on a D.C.M. vehicle. As soon as they reached near a pond at the side of the road, the applicants who were lying in wait with country made pistols surrounded them. The accused Pintoo cried out that Suraj Pal should not be allowed to escape and he fired on Suraj Pal with his country made pistol which hit Suraj on his stomach causing him to fall down. Then the brother-in-law (sala) of Pintoo, namely the applicant Indal also fired on him with his country made pistol, but this fire missed. When the witnesses tried to intervene, the accused Ajay threatened them that if anyone intervened in the matter, they would meet the same fate as Suraj Pal. T



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top