JUDGMENT

S.C. Agarwal, J.

Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Counsel for the Petitioners,learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Vinay Saran, learned Counselfor the complainant Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. With the consent of the parties, the petition is being disposed of atadmission stage itself.

3. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 27.4.2011 passed by Judicial Magistrate-III, Meerut in complaint case No. 518/9 of 2011 (Annexure 8) andjudgment and order dated 11.8.2011 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 15, Meerut dismissing criminal revision No. 226 of2011 (Annexure 9).

4. The complaint was filed by Respondent No. 2 against the Petitioners Dr. Pankaj Sharma and Dr. Nirpan Sharma as well as against the co-accused Pawan, Rakesh and Smt. Shakuntala for havingcommitted offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B Indian Penal Code with the allegations that the complainant wasan old lady of 70 years of age and was the recorded tenure holderwith transferable rights of plots No. 360, 335 situated at village Sisauli, pargana, tehsil and district Meerut. On 6.3.2011, the aforesaid five persons