SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 3181

SHASHI KANT GUPTA
SURYA PRAKASH GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH KUMARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pankaj Naqvi for the Petitioner; Manish Dev Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shashi Kant Gupta, J.—By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is inter alia challenging the order dated 17.10.2011 whereby the XIIth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 12, Bareilly in Small Cause Revision No. 7 of 2009 (Surya Prakash v. Smt. Santosh Kumari and another) has rejected the Application dated 17.10.2011 (Paper No. 53-C) whereby and wherein the prayers made by the petitioner before the Revisional Court to either remand the entire matter (the proceedings under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC) filed by the petitioner (third party applicant) to the lower Court for giving its findings on all the points afresh after taking into consideration the additional evidence admitted on record during the pendency of the revision, after the order of remand dated 20.10.2010.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows;

3. Respondent No. 1 allegedly claiming herself to be the landlady of the shop in dispute instituted a suit for ejectement, arrears of rent and mesne profits against the Respondent No. 2, Jagdish Narain Mehra on 30.4.2003. The said suit was registered as Small Cause Suit No. 29 of 2003 and was also decreed for eviction, arrears of rent and mesne



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top