Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Both these writ petitions involve common questions of law and facts and therefore, as requested and agreed by learned counsel for the parties, I proceed to decide the same under the rules of the Court at this stage by this common judgment.

2. It may also be placed on record that in writ petition No. 41420 of 2011, respondents have not filed counter-affidavit separately but have stated that since counter-affidavit, supplementary counter-affidavit and rejoinder-affidavit are already on record in connected writ petition No. 18198 of 2011, the same may be perused for the purpose of writ petition No. 41420 of 2011 and matter may be decided accordingly. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties I proceed accordingly.

3. The writ petition No. 18198 of 2011 (hereinafter referred to as “first writ petition”) has been filed assailing order dated 05/16th March, 2011 passed by respondent No. 2, Regional Level Committee, Saharanpur Mandal, Saharanpur (hereinafter referred to as “RLC”) whereby it has held respondent No. 7 senior to petitioner and has also directed for review/scrutiny of ad hoc appointment and regularization on the post of Lecturer (M