SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 357

ANIL KUMAR
RAM PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C. Bajpai and R.B. Lal for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Manish Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri V.S. Tripathi, learned State counsel and perused the record.

2. Facts in brief of the present case are that petitioner was initially appointed in the Agriculture Department of the State of Uttar Pradesh on Grade III post by order dated 15.6.1964 passed by Director of Agriculture and posted as Assistant Agriculture Inspector at Government Agriculture Seed Store, Manglaur, Saharanpur.

3. By an order dated 31.1.1978 (Annexure 4), he was placed under suspension. On 19.5.1978 (Annexure 5) a charge-sheet has been issued to the petitioner, after receiving same, as per the version of the petitioner, he demanded certain documents but the same has not been supplied to him, as such being no other alternative left before him, submitted his reply on 5.9.1978 (Annexure 6) inter alia denying charges leveled against him and in his reply he stated that Sri Suresh Chand Sharma was responsible for the embezzlement of DAP fertilizer who had received the fertilizer stock in question thereafter inquiry was conducted by Inquiry Officer who submitted the inquiry report to the punishing authority/Director of Agri





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top