SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1001

SURENDRA KUMAR
AJARA KHATOON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ramesh Rai for the Petitioners; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Surendra Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Ramesh Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.

2. The accused petitioners have preferred this Criminal Misc. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 1.12.2011 passed by the Special Judge (Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), Court No. 3, Deoria in Criminal Revision No. 263 of 2010, Smt. Ajara Khatoon and others v. State of U.P. and others, and order dated 3.10.2007 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Deoria in Criminal Case No. 2063 of 2007, State v. Suhail Ahmad and also to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Court below to pass a fresh order on the application of the petitioners under Section 179 Cr.P.C. and quash the entire proceedings pending against the petitioners arising out of case crime No. C-1 of 2006, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354 and 495 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Salempur, District Deoria.

3. The four petitioners namely Smt. Ajara Khatoon, alleged


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top