SHASHI KANT GUPTA
SANJIV – Appellant
Versus
MAHABIR DIGAMBAR JAIN MANDIR – Respondent
Hon’ble Shashi Kant Gupta, J.—This writ petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.3.2012 passed by the District Judge, Baghpat (Annexure No. 1) whereby the judgment and order dated 12.11.2010 passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Baghpat was set aside and the suit filed by the petitioner for arrears of rent and ejectment was decreed.
2. Brief facts of the case as set out in the writ petition are as follows;
3. One Surendra Singh was the original tenant of the shop in dispute who expired on 5.4.2004 and the tenancy was inherited by the present petitioners. A notice for termination of tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act (in short “TP Act”) was issued to the petitioners by the respondent on 28.11.2005 whereby arrears of rent was demanded and it was stated that the petitioners have sub-let the disputed premises. It was further stated that UP Act No. 13 of 1972 (in short “Act”) is not applicable to the disputed premises. The said notice was received by the petitioners on 30.11.2005. The petitioners paid the entire arrears of rent/damages to the respondent on 8.12.2005 i.e. before the expiry of the notice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.