SUDHIR AGARWAL
AMIT GARG – Appellant
Versus
TABASSUM – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Ajit Kumar, Advocate assisted by Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsels for the petitioners, Ari Ajay Kumar Singh and Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsels for contesting respondent No. 1 and Sri Krishna Shukla, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 5 & 6.
2. The petitioner’s application seeking amendment/impleadment in original suit No. 274/2004 has been rejected by Court below i.e. the Court of Addl. District Judge, Court No. 14, Allahabad by order dated 23.3.2012 and this revision has been preferred assailing the said order. This case has come up before this Court by nomination of Hon’ble the Chief Justice by His Lordship’s order dated 19.4.2012.
3. The original suit, admittedly, has been filed by the revisionists themselves impleading the following:
^^1- Jherh rcLlqe iRuh Jh vkbZ0vgen] fuokfluh] th0Vh0ch0 uxj djsyh] bykgkcknA 2- tkosn gSnj 3- ruohj gSnj 4- ukosn gSnj iq=x.k lS;~;n 'kkSdr vCckl] fuoklh othjxat] y[kuÅ] m0iz0A 5- vij ftykf/kdkjh utwy] bykgkcknA 6- ljdkj] m0iz0] ctfj;s dysDVj] bykgkcknA^^
4. The relief sought by the revisionists in the above suit are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.