SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1139

SUDHIR AGARWAL
AMIT GARG – Appellant
Versus
TABASSUM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Manu Saxena and Ajit Kumar for the Revisionists; Ajay Kumar Singh, Ashish Kumar Singh, Krishna Shukla and S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Ajit Kumar, Advocate assisted by Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsels for the petitioners, Ari Ajay Kumar Singh and Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsels for contesting respondent No. 1 and Sri Krishna Shukla, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 5 & 6.

2. The petitioner’s application seeking amendment/impleadment in original suit No. 274/2004 has been rejected by Court below i.e. the Court of Addl. District Judge, Court No. 14, Allahabad by order dated 23.3.2012 and this revision has been preferred assailing the said order. This case has come up before this Court by nomination of Hon’ble the Chief Justice by His Lordship’s order dated 19.4.2012.

3. The original suit, admittedly, has been filed by the revisionists themselves impleading the following:

^^1- Jherh rcLlqe iRuh Jh vkbZ0vgen] fuokfluh] th0Vh0ch0 uxj djsyh] bykgkcknA

2- tkosn gSnj

3- ruohj gSnj

4- ukosn gSnj

iq=x.k lS;~;n 'kkSdr vCckl] fuoklh othjxat] y[kuÅ] m0iz0A

5- vij ftykf/kdkjh utwy] bykgkcknA

6- ljdkj] m0iz0] ctfj;s dysDVj] bykgkcknA^^


4. The relief sought by the revisionists in the above suit are




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top