SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 126

J.N.TAKRU
Ram Kishore – Appellant
Versus
Bali Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Tripathi, for Applicant;
G.P. Bhargava and N.D. Ojha, for all Opposite Parties.

ORDER

This is a revision by Ram Kishore, and it arises under the following circumstances :

2. It appears that the applicant initiated proceedings under S.145, Criminal P.C. against the opposite parties in respect of the property mentioned in his application. His case was that he wanted to make some new constructions on the said land but as the opposite party threatened him with dire consequence he was prevented from making those constructions as a result of which there was an apprehension of breach of peace. On this application the learned S. D. M. called for a police report, and on being satisfied that an apprehension of breach of peace in respect of the said property existed, he passed a preliminary order under S.145, Criminal P.C., and pending decision attached the subject of dispute. By the same order he directed the parties to file their written-statements, affidavits, documents etc. on which they relied as regards their respective claims to actual possession of the subject of dispute. The parties filed their written-statements, affidavits etc. On the date of hearing, however, the applicant made a statement that he was prepared to have the case decided on the statement of Sri Pr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top