Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Shri Husain Sayeed Zamal Ahmad, Advocate holding brief of Shir S. Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri R.A.Khan, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.

By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 10.1.1994 (Annexure No. 4) passed by the opposite party No. 9/Additional Collector/Chief Revenue Officer, Bahraich.

2. Facts in brief of the present case are that the controversy involved in the present case relates to Gata No. 1870/6.82 situated in village Chhapariya, Pargana, Tehsil and District-Bahraich.

In respect of the land in dispute, the matter came up before the opposite party No. 9/Additional Collector/Chief Revenue Officer, Bahraich in a revision under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act alongwith an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

By means of the order dated 10.1.1994 as contained in Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition, opposite party No. 9/Additional Collector/Chief Revenue Officer, Bahraich heard the matter in regard to the condonation of delay/maintainability and after hearing the parties on the said issue, he reserved the