SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 234

WALI ULLAH, BIND BASNI PRASAD
Beni Madho Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Adit – Respondent


Advocates:
S.B. Jauhari, M.B. Bhatnagar and S.S. Varma, for Appellant; S.N. Varma, for Respondents.

Judgement

WALLI ULLAH, J. :- This appeal was heard by a Bench of two learned Judges of this Court, Sinha and Wanchoo, JJ. on 10-11-1947. At the close of the hearing, judgment was dictated in open Court by the learned Judges. In the result, the appeal was allowed, the decrees of the courts below were set aside and the claim of the plaintiff-appellant was decreed with costs. Before the transcript of the judgment was signed by the learned Judges, it appears that the case was mentioned to the learned Judges with the result that the transcript was not signed by either of the two learned Judges. On the contrary, it appears that at the stage of signing the transcript either one or both the learned Judges felt the necessity of having some points further clarified by further arguments from counsel. Thus on 9-12-1947, as the "order sheet" shows, some arguments were heard but they were not finished, and it was ordered that the case might be listed again after a week for further arguments. After this stage, it appears the case was never listed again before the learned Judges concerned. Meanwhile various other proceedings such as applications for substitution of names on account of successive de























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top