SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 290

DESAI
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Panchayati Adalat – Respondent


Advocates:
V.K.S. Chaudhury, for Applicants; S.C. Asthana, for Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT :- The applicants pray for the issue of a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction quashing the orders passed by the panchayati adalat of Bhojipura and by the Sub-divisional Magistrate. The applicants were prosecuted by the opposite-party No. 3 for offences of Sections 426, 323 and 506, I.P.C. before the panchayati adalat. The panchayati adalat convicted them of the offences and fined them on 12-8-1952. On 15-9-1952 they applied for a copy of the order and on 31-10-1952 they applied to the Sub-divisional Magistrate under Section 85 of the Panchayat Raj Act for revision of the order. The Sub-divisional Magistrate dismissed the application on the ground that having been filed more than sixty days from the date of the order, it was barred by time. He thought that under S. 85 of the Panchayat Raj Act an application for revision of a panchayati adalats order must be filed within sixty days of it. As the application was made after more than sixty days, it was thought by him to be barred by time. It is contended before me that the applicants were entitled under the Limitation Act to deduct the time spent by them in obtaining the copy of the panchayati adalats orde


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top