Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Rajendra Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. This writ petition was heard on 4.12.2009 and the judgment itself was dictated in open Court dismissing the writ petition. The judgment writer, however, could not take the dictation completely and after a long time submitted a transcription full of several gaps and extraordinary mistakes making virtually impossible to understand as to what has been said there. His explanation was called by my order dated 13.4.2010 on administrative side, besides seeking explanation from Head Private Secretary. Everybody tried to shift burden on others. Since the matter came before me after more than six months and it needed redictation of judgment, in the fitness of things I find it expedient that the writ petition should be listed in the Court again so that counsels may also appear and in their presence it should be dictated again after giving them opportunity to address, if the Court finds such occasion. I, therefore, passed order on 13.4.2010, relevant extract whereof is as under:

“Since the judgment was dictated in the open Court and it requires to be dictated again, list thi