SHRI NARAYAN SHUKLA, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
MAHILA VIDYALAYA, GANGA PRASAD ROAD, AMINABAD – Appellant
Versus
CHANCELLOR LUCKNOW UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sandeep Dixit and Mr. Vijay Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Prashant Chandra, assisted by Mr. Neeraj Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Dispute of all the writ petitions centers around the appointment and termination of Dr.(Smt.) Suprabha V. Sahai (respondent No. 3), therefore, all the writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by following common order;
W.P.No. 282(S.B) of 2006
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 28.2.2006, passed by the Chancellor of Lucknow University setting aside the order dated 5th September, 2005, passed by the Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University, Lucknow remitting the matter to the Vice-Chancellor to pass a fresh order on merit after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties counsel.
Writ Petition No. 1521(S.B) of 2006
4. In this case the same petitioner,i.e, Mahila Vidyalaya has challenged the order dated 30th October, 2006, passed by the Vice-Chancellor of the Lucknow university disapproving the order dated 10 th April,2005, passed by the College terminating the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.