SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2337

RAN VIJAI SINGH
PARAS – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, GORAKHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pawan Kumar Mishra and L.K. Tripathi for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Through this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs :

(i) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to expunge the alleged and forged amaldaramad made in the CH-Form 23 Part-1 referring the alleged reference No. 388 under Section 48 (3) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 decided on 20.2.2005 by the respondent No. 1 and alleged Case No. 2089 under Section 9 U.P. C.H.Act decided on 31.1.2005 by the respondent No. 2 (Annexure-4 to this writ petition).

(ii) Issue, any other writ, order or direction to which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

(iii) To award cost of the petition to the petitioner.

Heard Sri L.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for State respondents.

Through this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to expunge the forged amaldaramad made in the CH-Form 23 Part-1 referring the alleged reference No. 388 under sub-section (3) of Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top