VINEET SARAN, MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
INTERNATIONAL RECREATION PARKS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri Rakesh Dwivedi, Senior Advocate and Sri Naveen Sinha, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Anurag Khanna, Sri Pradeep Aggarwal, Sri Ajai Fatiyal, Ms. Sansuiti Pathak and Sri Nikhil Sharma for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh, advocate for respondents 2, 3 and 4. Pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and with their consent, we proceed to decide the writ petition at the admission stage itself.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 1.1.2009, 1.10.2007 and 30.11.2007, whereby the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (for short ‘’NOIDA’), has called upon the petitioner company to deposit various amounts as change in constitution (for short ‘’CIC’) charges, consequent to the change in its share-holding pattern, which has been made a condition precedent for execution of tripartite sub-lease-deeds between the petitioner company, NOIDA and the sub-lessees and for a mandamus commanding the respondents to execute the tripartite sub-lease-deeds without compelling the petitioner to pay CIC charges.
3. The factual ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.