SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 2639

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
(Lucknow Bench)
BEFORE : AJAI LAMBA AND ZAKI ULLAH KHAN, JJ.
RAKESH SRIVASTAVA .....Appellant (In Jail)
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 742 of 1997, decided on 20th November, 2013)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Praveen Begum and A.P. Mishra (Amicus curiae) for the Appellant; G.A. for the Respondent.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 498-A, 304-B and 302—Evidence Act, 1872—Sections 113-B and 6—Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961—Section 2—Dowry demand—Cruelty—Dowry death—Child witness—Reliability of his testimony—In present case death took place within 7 years of marriage—Unnatural death—Victim subjected to cruel treatment by appellant—Child witness stated that his brother and sister were burnt to death—G.D. recorded on basis of statement of an independent neighbour—Relevant evidence under Section 6—Victim she was shabbily treated and tortured to death—No evidence that how other two infants killed—However, conviction under Section 302 unsustainable. [Paras 36, 38, 39, 40 and 41]

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Zaki Ullah Khan, J.—The instant appeal has been preferred by appellant- Rakesh Srivastava against the judgment and order dated 4.11.1997 passed by VIth Additional District Judge, Lucknow in Sessions Trial No. 417 of 1995 (State v. Rakesh Srivastava) convicting him under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo three years’ rigorous imprisonment under Section 498-A IPC and imprisonment for life under each Sections 304-B and 302 I.P.C. respectively.

2. The facts giving rise to the appeal, in brief, are that complainant Niranjan Kumar Sinha lodged a written report at Police Station Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, alleging that his daughter Smt. Poornima Srivastava was married to appellant-Rakesh Srivastava on 13.12.1984 ; that Rakesh Srivastava- appellant was employed as Peon in the Jal Nigam Headquarter ; that immediately after marriage, the appellant started harassing the deceased ; that he used to beat her and often demanded money; he was reprimanded couples of times but he did not pay any heed ; that on 4.10.1990 his daughter came to his house and she demanded Rs. 5000/- from his wife on persuasion of appellant, but due to paucity of funds, she could not fulfill the demand of the appellant ; that his daughter apprised the appellant regarding the poor financial condition of the complainant ; that agitated by non-fulfillment of his desire, he satisfied his anger by badly beating her ; that on 5.10.1990 again the appellant beat her and thereafter sprinkled kerosene oil on her and infant daughter Sweta alias Neha and son Subham and torched fire ; that elder son Nippoo, however, somehow escaped and raised alarm and informed the neighbours regarding the incident ; that the appellant meanwhile carried his infant son Nitin alias Subham aged about two and half years in half burnt position and admitted him in Balrampur Hospital and left the other two in the state of burning; that Subham succumbed to burn injuries at 5.45 p.m. in Balrampur Hospital ; that the appellant on previous occasion, also caused injuries by giving her electric shocks ; that the complainant prayed for immediate action by submitting written report Ext.Ka.1 to the Station Officer on 7.10.1990 at 9.45 hrs. and on his written report a chick F.I.R. Ext.Ka.2 was registered on 7.10.1990 and the G.D. was prepared on the basis of Chick F.I.R. which is Ext. Ka.3; that the postmortem of the deceased Smt.Poornima was conducted in Balrampur Hospital on 6.10.1990, postmortem of Km. Sweta and Shubham was conducted the same day in Balrampur Hospital i.e. on 6.10.1990 ; that during investigation the Investigating Officer prepared the site plan of the place of occurrence Ext.Ka.7 ; that before registration of the F.I.R. of the complainant, one report was also lodged by one Sri A.P. Singh resident of House No. 2/292, Vishal Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow on 5.10.1990 at about 14.15 hrs. in which he stated that on 5.10.1990 at about 1.30 p.m. one woman and a child had been burnt and he could gather the information when a small boy came running to him ; that Sri A.P.Singh and other neighbours found that one lady and one child burnt to death ; that Sri A.P. Singh had also mentioned in his written report that father of burnt children also came there after sometime and he informed that there was another child who had been burnt but he tried to rescue him by admitting him in hospital.

3. The information given by Sri A.P. Singh had been recorded in the G.D., which is Ext.Ka.9 ; that the Investigating Officer prepared inquest report at the spot, of the deceased Poornima and sealed her body, inquest report is Ext.Ka.11. The Investigating Officer also prepared Police Form No. 13, which is Ext.Ka.12 as well as Khaka lash Ext.Ka 13 and sealed the dead body of Smt.Poornima the memo of which is Ext.Ka.14 and requested the Superintendent, King Georges Medical College, Lucknow to conduct the autopsy, vide memo Ext.Ka.15 ; Investigating Officer also prepared the inquest


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top