Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Pankaj Srivastava for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents. Since pleadings are complete, as requested and agreed by learned counsel for the parties, I have proceeded to hear and decide it, under the Rules of the Court, at this stage.

2. Though there are several reliefs sought in this writ petition but in effect, petitioner’s claim is three fold: (i) regularisation on a group ‘D’ post in Forest Department (ii) payment of salary at minimum of regular pay scale so long he is not regularised as per the decision in State of U.P. v. Putti Lal, (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1595 and (iii) not to be terminated orally or otherwise.

3. Besides above, there is an additional issue in this matter. The petitioner has assailed an order dated 24.6.2011 (Annexure 16 to writ petition), which is a letter issued by Principal Conservator of Forest (Administration), U.P., Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the “PCF (Admn.)”) to the Principal Conservator, (Wildlife), U.P., Lucknow and all Chief Conservator of Forest, U.P. stating that not only vacancies newly created as supernumerary, by Government Order dated 23.6.2011, ought to be utilized for reg