SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 431

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SHEO KUMAR SINGH AND P.K.S. BAGHEL, JJ.
Dr. MEHANDI HASAN AND ANOTHER ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Special Appeal No. 958 of 2007, decided on 20th February, 2014)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Ashok Khare and J.P. Singh for the Appellants; C.S.C, G.K. Singh, Prabhakar Awasthi, R.P. Singh, V.K. Singh and Vikas Budhwar for the Respondents.

Headnote:U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921—Sections 16-FF, 16-E, 16-F, Chapter-II, Regulation 17 (g)—Constitution of India, 1950—Article 30—Selection—Minority educational institution—De-facto doctrine—Applicability—In present case Committee of Management followed procedure under Regulation 17 of Chapter II—Only dispute with regard to authority of Committee of Management to make selection—As there was managerial dispute at time of selection of petitioners—Held, appointment of petitioners are saved by de-facto doctrine. [Paras 15 and 17]

       Result; Special Appeal Disposed of.

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This special appeal arises out of the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 23.3.2007, whereby the writ petition of the petitioner has been dismissed. The learned Single Judge has decided a batch of petitions by a common judgment and the petitioners’ claim has been rejected.

2. The basic facts, which are relevant to decide the issue in question, are as follows;

3. Fazal-ur-Rahman Islamia Inter College, Bareilly (for short, the “Institution”) is a minority institution. It receives the aid out of the State fund. The affairs of the Institution are managed by a committee of management. The provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (for short, the “Act, 1921”) and the Regulations of the said Act regulate the affairs of the Institution.

4. Three vacancies of lecturers arose due to retirement of three permanent teachers namely Hooram Singh Yadav, Lecturer in Hindi; Ram Gopal Sharma, Lecturer in Civics; and Mohd. Naseem, Lecturer in Economics. The Committee of Management on 29th September, 2002 issued an advertisement in two newspapers namely ‘Amar Ujala’ and ‘Janmorcha’ inviting applications for selection of lecturers in Hindi, Economics and Civics. The last date for submission of the application form was 19.10.2002.

5. The petitioners made applications in pursuance of the said advertisement. They received call letters under registered cover on 12.7.2003. The selection committee met on 22.7.2003. It is stated that the selection committee was constituted in terms of the provisions of Act, 1921 and the present Principal Mohd. Shakeel Raza Khan was also one of the members of the selection committee. The petitioners faced the selection committee and were found suitable. The papers were sent to the office of District Inspector of Schools (for short, the “DIOS”) for his approval. The DIOS did not take any decision on the said papers. Accordingly, the committee of management assumed deemed approval of the appointment in terms of Regulation 17(g) of Chapter-II of the Regulations under the Act, 1921. Accordingly, the petitioners were issued appointment letters on 12th September, 2003. The petitioners were allowed to join their services on 16th September, 2013 by the Principal Mohd. Shakeel Raza Khan.

6. The committee of management sent the salary bill of the petitioners to the office of DIOS, but when no action was taken the petitioners preferred Writ Petition No. 42385 of 2005 for a direction upon the respondents to pay their salary w.e.f. their joining. In the said writ petition a counter-affidavit was filed. The stand taken in the counter-affidavit was that at the time of the selection, the committee of management headed by Haji Mukhtar Waseem was not validly constituted committee, as in August, 2003 Haji Mukhtar Waseem has got the recognition by concealment of the fact as the said order was stayed on 6.11.2000.

7. Aggrieved by the said order Haji Mukhtar Waseem has preferred Writ Petition No. 49683 of 2000, wherein an interim order was passed by this Court and on the strength of the interim order he continued. There are allegations of mismanagement against the said Manager. The Regional Director of Education vide order dated 26.11.2001 had appointed the Prabandh Sanchalak and DIOS by the order dated 4.10.2001 had imposed a ban for all selections.

8. The Manager of the Institution aggrieved by the said orders, had preferred a Writ Petition No. 6617 of 2000, which was disposed of with a direction to decide the appeal of the Manager. The appeal was rejected.

9. Feeling aggrieved by the said order the Manager preferred a writ petition, in which an interim order was passed by this Court. For the aforesaid reason the approval of the petitioners was not made. It is also stated that this Court in Writ Petition Nos. 15803 of 2004 and 16101 of 2004 had passed an order dated 21st April 2004 till the managerial disputes are pending in the Court, the DIOS shall continue to pay salary of all the teachers and the employe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top