DEVI PRASAD SINGH, ADITYA NATH MITTAL
KRISHNA KUMAR ASTHANA – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR – Respondent
Hon’ble Aditya Nath Mittal, J.—All these first appeal from first orders relates to the same accident, hence, they are taken together.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company.
2. As per the claimants, on 7.4.2004, Pankaj Kumar Asthana (deceased) was travelling from Lucknow to Sindholi by his Motorcycle No. 32 A.T./6686 alongwith his wife Smt. Dali Asthana, son Saurabh Kumar alias Neeraj, daughter Shivangi Asthana alias Pinki. The deceased was having valid driving license. At about 4.00 PM, when he reached near Makimpur Crossing, then Qualis Vehicle No. P.B.02 A.G./7974, which was being driven very rashly and negligently caused accident with the motorcycle of Pankaj Kumar Asthana due to which Pankaj Kumar Asthana, Smt. Dali Asthana, Saurabh Kumar alias Neeraj, Shivangi Asthana alias Pinki received grievous injuries and they were first brought to P.H.C. Sindholi from where they were referred to Medical Collage, Lucknow. Pankaj Kumar Asthana expired on the same day while other persons remained admitted in the Medical Collage for a few days. MAC No. 193/2004 was filed by the parents as well as the injured persons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.