SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 532

RAN VIJAI SINGH
BIRBAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Manjari Singh and Kunal Ravi Singh for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead concerned Gaon Sabha as respondent No. 7 and serve the copy of the writ petition to Sri Rajesh Yadav, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to correct the description of respondent No. 2.

2. Heard Sri Kunal Ravi Singh alongwith Smt. Manjari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Rajesh Yadav, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 31.12.2013 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer Sadar, Muzaffarnagar in Case No. 10/2006-07 (Birbal Singh v. Naresh Chand Jain and others) and order dated 29.1.2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Adminstration) Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur in Revision No. 28/2013-14 (Birbal Singh v. Smt. Rahisa Begum and others).

3. While assailing the impugned orders, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that both the Courts below have erred in rejecting the petitioner’s objection to decide the application for condonation of delay first






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top