SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 842

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
SUKHBEER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, MEERUT – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Prabhakar Sinha for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Anuj Kumar for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.—Rejoinder-affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Prabhakar Sinha for the petitioner.

3. This writ petition has been filed against the orders of Additional Collector dated 31.5.2008, rejecting the application of the petitioner under Section 28 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and Additional Commissioner dated 1.10.2009, dismissing the revision of the petitioner.

4. It is stated that in the reference under Section 48(3) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, Deputy Director of Consolidation passed an order dated 9.9.1980, shifting the chak road from plots 556, 557 and 566 to plots 563, 564 and 566. The order of Deputy Director of Consolidation has been duly incorporated in consolidation record on 1.10.1980, but in the final consolidation map, the correction was not made according to the order dated 9.9.1980. The petitioner therefore filed an application before Consolidation Officer for giving effect to the order dated 9.9.1980, which has been dismissed by Consolidation Officer by the order dated 21.1.2006 on the ground that under Rule 109-A of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top