SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 98

V.K.KHANNA, S.R.SINGH
Chameli Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Virendra Singh

Judgment

V.K. Khanna, J.

1. In these two connected writ petitions the land of the petitioners has been acquired under a common notification issued under sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act Learned counsel for the parties have prayed that these two cases may, be taken together as the questions of law involved in both the cases are common. These two writ petitions ere thus being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. According to the petitioners of writ petition no, 15377 of 1983 they are co-bhumidhars and in possession of plot no, 16 area 5 bighas 6 biswas 14 biswansis situate in village Bairam Nagar, Pargana Nahtaur Tahsil Dhampur district Bijnor. According to them on a portion of this plot the petitioners' pucca residential house exists for the last 20 years in which the petitioners and their family members are living. A tube well also exists on the plot in dispute. According to the petitioners they have planted a grove over a portion of the plot which has about 150 mango, guava, papaya, Aadoo trees. Banana and other fruit bearing trees. The State Government had taken a decision to acquire land for rural housing and in that connection the Tahsildar had made a report on 3-8-197



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top