SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 224

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Deepak Pahwa – Appellant
Versus
Lt. Governor Of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Bharati Anand, L.M.SINGHVI

JUDGMENT

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:—We are dismissing both the Special Leave Petitions. But we propose to give our reasons for doing so, which we do not generally do, as our attention has been invited to some judgments of High Courts which we consider have been wrongly decided, proceeding as they do on a misunderstanding of some observations of this Court. A combined notification under Sections 4 and 17 and a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act were published in the Delhi Extraordinary Gazette on 18-6-1994 in regard to the acquisition of certain lands in the village Bijwasan for the purpose of construction of a New Transmitting Station for the Delhi Airport. Public Notice of the substance of the notification under Sec. 4 was alleged to have been given in the locality on 17-7-1994. It was also alleged that the matter was under correspondence between various departments of the Government, for nearly eight years before the notification and the declaration were published in the Gazette. A writ petition was filed in the Delhi High Court impugning the notification and the declaration on two grounds. The first was that the delay of 29 days in giving public notice of the s


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top