SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 609

S.C.JAIN, I.S.MATHUR
Ghanshiam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
P.N.Mishra

JUDGMENT

I. S. Mathur, J.

(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.5.1980, passed by the Sessions Judge, Bijnor, convicting the appellant Jamuna Prasad under Sections 307 and 302, I.P.C., and appellant Ghanshiam Singh under Sections 307/34 and 302/34,I.P.C. and sentencing them to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and five years respectively for offence under Sections 307 and 307/34, I.P.C. and Imprisonment for Life for offence under Sections 302 and 302/34, I.P.C.

(2.) ACCORDING to the prosecution case, the appellants, the deceased Chhotey and injured Mukaridi belong to the same village Gopalpur. On 12.12.1978 deceased Chhotey and his brother Haria (P.W. 1) along with some other persons, started for Railway Station, Balawali, at about 7 p.m. to escort their mother and the daughter-in-law of Asha Ram who were coming by Sealdah Express. The time of arrival of the said train was 6.05 p.m., but on that date it was reported to be late by two hours. Amongst the persons who accompanied Chhotey, deceased, and Haria, Har Dayal and Mukandi had licensed guns with them. When they reached some distance near the field of Bhajna at about 8 p.m. a shot was fired at M



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top