SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1451

ANIL KUMAR
S. M. Khalid – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India and others – Respondent


Advocates:
Lalit Shukla, Anil Kumar Srivastava

Anil Kumar,J. -

1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Present writ petition has come up before this Court on C.M. Application No. 43533 of 2010 moved by the petitioner for interim relief.

3. Further, when the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present writ petition may be heard and disposed of finally in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as the opposite parties are proceeding to take final decision. Sri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the above prayer.

4. In view of the the above facts with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties present writ petition is heard finally and disposed of today.

5. The factual matrix of the present case are that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Clerk in Bank of India, Aishbagh branch, Lucknow(hereinafter referred to as 'Bank') by opposite party no.2 on 24.9.1975, confirmed on 24.3.1976. Further, the petitioner while working and discharging his duties received a telegram that his sister who was residing at Muscat had suffered serious illness so















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top