SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1911

SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
Sarvesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. & Anr. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Kumar Verma

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for the respondent no.1 and perused the impugned judgment and order.

2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of finally at the stage of admission.

3. It appears that the petitioner Sarvesh has been summoned under section 319 CrPC to face trial in regard to the offences under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, police station Wazirganj, district Lucknow in criminal case No. 1869/2009 State vs. Kallu & others, vide the order dated 28.1.2010 passed by the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, CBI (Ayo.Pra.), Lucknow.

4. During the trial, PW-1 Mohd. Akram was examined, who has deposed in regard to complicity of the petitioner along with the charge-sheeted accused. The learned lower court placing reliance on the statement of the witness, has passed the impugned order summoning the petitioner.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, has not recorded any satisfaction that on the basis of the evidence adduced, there was a possibility of conviction of the petitioner, therefore, the summoning order























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top