SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 4151

DEVI PRASAD SINGH
Sree Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S.C., G.K.Pandey

Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Dixit,J.:-

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.

Issuance of notice to the private opposite parties is dispensed with.

The petitioner has filed Regular Suit No.468/2008 with regard to Plot No.292/SA-4 situated in Village Dhawan Kotwali Chinhat District Lucknow. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow has granted injunction but the same has not been complied with by the private respondents. Hence the petitioner moved an application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the C.P.C before the Additional District Magistrate, which is pending consideration.

It has been submitted by the petitioner's counsel that during the pendency of the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the C.P.C., the opposite parties are interfering with the peaceful possession of the land in question. The petitioner also appears to have made complaints against the private respondents to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and others higher authorities. An F.I.R. also appears to have been lodged by the petitioner to ventilate his grievance. However, no action has yet been taken by the concerned authorities. In an identical controversy in the case of Mohd.Hamaj








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top