DEVI PRASAD SINGH
Sree Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
Issuance of notice to the private opposite parties is dispensed with.
The petitioner has filed Regular Suit No.468/2008 with regard to Plot No.292/SA-4 situated in Village Dhawan Kotwali Chinhat District Lucknow. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow has granted injunction but the same has not been complied with by the private respondents. Hence the petitioner moved an application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the C.P.C before the Additional District Magistrate, which is pending consideration.
It has been submitted by the petitioner's counsel that during the pendency of the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the C.P.C., the opposite parties are interfering with the peaceful possession of the land in question. The petitioner also appears to have made complaints against the private respondents to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and others higher authorities. An F.I.R. also appears to have been lodged by the petitioner to ventilate his grievance. However, no action has yet been taken by the concerned authorities. In an identical controversy in the case of Mohd.Hamaj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.