SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1792

SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
Shyam Sunder and another – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and another – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K.Singh

Shri Kant Tripathi,J.:-

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned AGA for the respondent no.1 and perused the impugned judgment and order.

2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of finally at the stage of admission.

3. It appears that the petitioners Shyam Sunder and Smt. Munni have been summoned under section 319 CrPC to face trial in regard to the offences under sections 306/302 IPC in S.T.No. 773/2009 State vs. Ram Ashrey, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.4, Hardoi.

4. During the trial, three eye witnesses (PW-1, PW-2 and PW-3) were examined, who have deposed in regard to complicity of the petitioners along with the charge-sheeted accused. The learned lower court placing reliance on the statements of the witnesses, has passed the impugned order summoning the petitioners.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has not recorded any satisfaction that on the basis of the evidence adduced, there was a possibility of conviction of the petitioners, therefore, the summoning order is bad.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioners furt






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top