SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2999

SERVESH KUMAR GUPTA
Ashutosh Pandey and others – Appellant
Versus
Anupama Pandey and others – Respondent


Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.;—

By way of this petition moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the prayer has been advanced to quash the entire proceedings of the criminal complaint case no.331 of 2006, titled as Smt. Anupama Pandey Vs. Ashutosh Pandey, pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh. It has also been prayed to quash the order of cognizance dated 31.3.2006, asking all the petitioners to stand for trial for the offence of Section 406 IPC.

2. Having heard the learned counsel of either parties, the factual matrix, in the pivot of this petition, pertains to a matrimonial dispute. Smt. Anupama Pandey espoused with Ashutosh Pandey on 9.7.2000 at Kanpur (Uttar Pradesh). It is pertinent to mention that Bhairav Prasad Pandey and Smt. Meena Pandey are the parents of Ashutosh Pandey. Having passed almost 3½ years of blissful matrimonial life, the differences between the couple erupted and those took a serious and severe turn on 5.3.2004, when Smt. Anupama Pandey was forced to leave her matrimonial house at Kanpur along with her twin sons, Madhav and Kartikeya. It has been alleged by petitioner that on the relevant date 5.3.2004, her father O.S. Mishra, accom













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top