SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 445

DILIP GUPTA
K. C. Gangwar(Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
David Jacob – Respondent


Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This petition, at the instance of the tenant, seeks the quashing of the order dated 26th March, 2008 passed by the Prescribed Authority by which the application filed by the landlord under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for release of the tenanted shop for establishing the two grand sons in business has been allowed. The petitioner has also sought the quashing of the judgment and order dated 30th April, 2010 by which the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 22 of the Act for setting aside the aforesaid order of the Prescribed Authority has been dismissed.

2. It transpires from the records of the writ petition that an application under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act was filed by the landlord-David Jacob for release of the two tenanted shops for the need of his two grand sons Vikas Jacob and Abhishek Jacob for establishing them in business. It was asserted that Vikas Jacob and Abhishek Jacob, sons of his elder son Deepak Jacob, had studied only upto Intermediate and were unemployed. Vikas Jacob wanted to start a General Store shop while Abhishek Jacob wanted




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top