Hon’ble S.S. Chauhan, J.—This civil revision has been filed challenging the order passed by the District Judge, Lucknow dated 24.7.2006. In the aforesaid order, a direction was given that the revisionist is at liberty to move a separate application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. by filing a criminal complaint against the person concerned of the respondents for making manipulation in the record.

2. The proceedings emanated on account of initiation of arbitration proceedings before the arbitrator in respect of a dispute between the revisionist and the respondents. After the pleading of the parties and receiving the evidence, the award was given on 7.1.2006. The said award was served upon the respondents on 9.1.2006. The respondents moved an application under Section 34 (3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Act”) for condoning the delay, inter alia, on the ground that the award dated 7.1.2006 was received in the office of Director, Amausi Airport, Lucknow on 10.1.2006 along with covering letter and after receipt of the award, the matter was referred to the New Delhi Office for advice and simultaneously an advice was also taken from the counsel at New Delhi. The c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document