SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 408

AMAR SARAN, DINESH GUPTA
Anil Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Petitioner: Hitesh Pachori.
Counsel for the Respondents: A.G.A.

Dinesh Gupta, J.—

Counter affidavit filed today by the Investigating Officer on behalf of the State is taken on record. The investigating officer states that the investigation is still pending.

The investigating officer shall again be present on the next date of listing and inform this Court about the progress made in completing the investigation.

Another issue raised in this petition is for issuance of directions for taking steps for expediting the process of producing or directing the accused to appear before the Magistrate concerned at the time of submission of the report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C.

The tardiness of the investigating and the trial process is not only violative of the Fundamental Rights of an accused for a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, but it is also prejudicial to the prosecution. If the trial is allowed to be prolonged for a long period of time, the witnesses lose interest or they are won over by the accused and justice is the casualty in either case.

Specifically by the earlier two orders dated 7.1.2013 and 17.1.2013, we had directed the State for issuance of the circular at the level of the police for ensuring that the accused is pre


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top