SUDHIR AGARWAL
Vijay Kumar Gupta and Another – Appellant
Versus
Sumitra Devi and 2 Ors. – Respondent
This is a tenants writ petition. The respondents-landlords instituted Rent Case No. 17 of 2003 under Section 21(1)(a) U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act, 1972") seeking ejectment of petitioners and others from the accommodation in question on the ground of personal need. The Prescribed Authority while upholding the bona fide of personal need set up by respondents-landlords, partly allowed application vide order dated 12.04.2012 directing release of some part of tenanted accommodation so that tenants may continue to stay in left part.
2. Aggrieved by aforesaid order the respondents-landlords preferred Rent Appeal No. 11 of 2012 while the petitioners-tenants also preferred Rent Appeal No. 9 of 2013. The Lower Appellate Court by means of impugned order dated 28.10.2013 has allowed appeal of landlords and dismissed tenants' appeal. The order of Prescribed Authority has been modified by allowing landlords' release application in its entirety.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners have no other accommodation and should be allowed to continue.
4. The findings of facts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.