SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1478

V.K.SHUKLA, SHASHI KANT
Bindu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sheo Ram Singh and C.J. Yadav for the Petitioners; Ashish Kumar Srivastava for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Brief background of the case as is emanating from the pleadings as set out in the writ petition and annexures appended thereto that a unregistered will deed was shown to have been executed by the mother of Harshwardhan Singh namely Smt. Dev Kumari Singh on 8.10.1993 in favour of Budhoo @ Ramesh Singh. Said Budhoo @ Ramesh Singh further has executed registered power of attorney relating to the said property in question in favour of Dinesh Mishra S/o Heera Lal on 30.10.2000 and based on the said power of attorney Dinesh Mishra S/o Heera Lal got mutated name of Budhoo @ Ramesh Singh on 4.11.2000 and then has executed registered sale deed of the disputed property in favour of Smt. Uma Rai W/o Ram Nagina Rai on 23.8.2004 in which Bindu Devi W/o Dinesh Mishra is marginal witness.

2. Harshwardhan S/o late Diwakar Singh, respondent No. 4 after acquiring knowledge of the fact that entire proceedings in reference of execution unregistered will deed; in respect of registered power of attorney and in respect of execution of sale deed; all are forged and manipulated proceedings and that at no point of time his mother Smt. Dev Kumari Singh has ever proceeded to execute any























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top