SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1406

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VINEET SARAN AND MRS. VIJAY LAKSHMI, JJ.
MOHAMMAD TAYYAB ....Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Special Appeal Nos. 283, 281, 282 of 2014, decided on 29th August, 2014)

Advocates:
Counsel :
M.A. Khan and Chandra Bhan Gupta for the Appellant; C.S.C., R.K. Ojha, Ashok Khare, S.K. Singh Paliwal, Tahira Kazmi and Muqeem Ahmad for the Respondents.

Headnote:U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921—Section 16-A(7)—Societies Registration Act, 1860—Section 25—Election Process—Determination—Alternative remedy—Writ petition—Maintainability of—Whether writ petition challenging the order dated 29.1.2014 passed by Election Officer, whereby the list of members had been finalized by Election Officer could be challenged in writ petition—Held, 'Yes'—Once election process has started, Court should not normally interfere but where it is found that certain persons cannot participate in the election on the basis of an earlier determination by Competent Authority, there is no reason not to look into the same—Rule of alternative remedy is not an absolute bar and it depends on the facts of each case, as to whether the party may be relegated to approach the alternative forum available or to entertain writ petition—As directions were given by the writ Court to finalize the electoral college after publishing a tentative list inviting objections, yet when the same had not been done and the list finalized without complying with the directions of writ Court and final list was published, with simultaneous announcement of election schedule, maintainability of writ petition challenging the said action held not barred—No denial of fact that objections were never invited by Election Officer or that any tentative list was published as directed to be done by the writ Court—Plea of alternative remedy ruled out. [Paras 26 to 43]

       Result; Order Accordingly.

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This is a bunch of three special appeals directed against the judgement and order dated 24.2.2014 passed in separate writ petitions No. 7474 of 2014, 7634 of 2014 and 7727 of 2014, which were all filed against the order dated 29.1.2014 passed by the Election Officer.

2. The dispute in the present appeal is with regard to the election process for electing the members of the Managing Committee of the Azamgarh Muslim Education Society, Azamgarh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Society’), which runs two prestigious colleges, namely, Shibili National P.G. College, Azamgarh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘PG College’) and Shibli National Inter College, Azamgarh (hereafter referred to as to the ‘Inter College’).

3. The last elections of the managing committee of the society as well as of the two institutions were held on 30.1.2011, which were in terms of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 1736 of 2010. In the said elections held in the year 2011, there were 699 members of the general body of the society. It is not disputed that the general body of the society is the same as that of the two institutions. In terms of the said elections held on 30.1.2011, there were 18 members elected for the managing committee of the society and 18 separate members of the managing committee of the PG College, Azamgarh and 17 members of the managing committee of the Inter College, Azamgarh. The said elections were held by the Court appointed Additional District Judge as the Election Officer. No dispute with regard to the said elections was raised by any of the parties.

4. Then on 3.12.2013, the President of the then managing committee Sri Abu Saleh Ansari (respondent No. 12 herein) issued a notice for holding of fresh elections of the managing committee on 26.12.2013. Another notice dated 5.12.2013 was issued by the Secretary of the society Sri Mohd. Tayyab (appellant herein) fixing 29.12.2013 for elections of the managing committee. Five independent members of the general body then filed a writ petition No. 69973 of 2013 praying for a direction in the nature of mandamus to the Assistant Registrar to get the elections held through an independent authority. By detailed judgement and order dated 19.12.2013 passed in the said writ petition, the learned Single Judge passed an order for holding of elections of the managing committee as well as of two institutions of the society, which was in terms of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 1736 of 2010 with regard to the earlier elections. The said order was passed with consent of learned counsel for the parties. The operative portion of the said judgement dated 19.12.2013 passed in writ petition No. 69973 of 2013 is reproduced below :

“In this view of the matter when all the parties have agreed that the election should be held by the Judicial Officer, it is appropriate that election for constituting the Committee of Management of the Society and the Institutions should be held by an Additional District Judge of Judgeship Azamgarh to be nominated by the District Judge, Azamgarh. The Judicial Officer, who shall act as the Election Officer, shall determine the members entitled to participate in the election after inviting objections and shall thereafter fix the election schedule on Saturday and Sunday in the month of January, 2014. The entire process should be completed by 31st January, 2014. Any person aggrieved with the list finalised by the learned Additional District Judge can file objections after the election is held and the result is declared before the appropriate authority. The Society shall also pay a sum of Rs.35,000/- as honorarium to the learned Additional District Judge nominated by the District Judge, Azamgarh. The parties shall file a certified copy of this order before the District Judge, Azamgarh who shall do the needful.

Needles to say that notices referred to above for holding the ele






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top