SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 610

H. L. GOKHALE, DILIP GUPTA
RAMA KANT – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, FIRMS, SOCIETIES AND CHITS, U. P. VARANASI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sachindra Mohan for the Appellants; K.P.S. Yadav for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Honble H.L. Gokhale, C.J.—Heard Mr. Sachindra Mohan in support of this appeal. Mr. K.P.S. Yadav appears for the respondents.

2. The appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 2nd March, 2005 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the petition filed by the appellants herein was dismissed.

3. The case of the appellants was that an erroneous order was passed on 3rd June, 2002 by the Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits Funds, U.P. Varanasi, by which 36 members, who were not the valid members of the Society, were permitted to vote in the election of the Society. A petition was, accordingly, filed to quash and set aside the aforesaid order dated 3rd June, 2002. The respondents were 26 out of these 36 members. The learned Judge, however, dismissed the petition solely on the ground that under that order, the election to the Society had already been notified and, therefore, the Court should not interfere in the election process.

4. Mr. Sachindra Mohan, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the learned Judge ignored the fact that the very 36 persons of the Society were already disqualified by the Prescribed Authority by its order dated 29th Aug







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top