SUNEET KUMAR
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—The respondent State Bank of India issued an advertisement in August, 2009 inviting applications for the post of Assistant Clerk, the petitioner being eligible applied for the post; appeared in the written examination on 8.11.2009, on qualifying, petitioner appeared in the interview on 26.4.2010, was declared selected. The respondent bank issued appointment letter on 3.12.2010, pursuant thereof, petitioner joined on 20.12.2010 as Assistant Clerk at Branch Dohrighat, District Mau of State Bank of India. Petitioner was sent on training, on successful completion of training petitioner was posted at Gorakhpur by order dated 13.6.2011. The probation period of the petitioner was enhanced by three months for unsatisfactory work. By order dated 27.8.2011, passed by the Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Gorakhpur, respondent No. 5, the service of the petitioner was terminated for the reason that some person impersonating himself, appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the written examination.
2. The petitioner is assailing order dated 27.8.2011 passed by respondent No. 5.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was not g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.