SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 59

VIKRAM NATH, DINESH GUPTA
NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GULAB SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Rakesh Bahadur for the Appellant; S.D. Ojha for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri Rakesh Bahadur, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S.D. Ojha, learned counsel representing the claimant-respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. This appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the Insurance Company assailing the correctness of the award dated 25.9.2014 passed by Additional District Judge/Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Court No. 13, Meerut in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 1279 of 2011, Gulab Singh and another v. Smt. Parul Sharma and another, whereby the Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs. 13,05,000/- alongwith interest to the claimants against the Insurance Company.

3. Relevant facts giving rise to the claim petition are that in the forenoon of 2.10.2011 Govinda (deceased) was travelling by private bus No. DL IP 8059 alongwith other passengers which was going from village Jaiee to Meerut city. At about 11.30 a.m. the bus stopped near Jail Chungi Chopla for the passengers to deboard. The deceased while trying to step down from the bus fell down as the driver of the bus suddenly started without giving sufficient time to the deceased to get down and as a result he was crushed under the wheels of the bus. T
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top