SUDHIR KUMAR SAXENA
VIJAY SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION) LUCKNOW DIVISION – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Kumar Saxena, J.—Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been directed against the orders dated 14.3.2014, 28.7.2014 and 17.11.2014 passed by Naib Tehsildar, Sadar Unnao, Deputy Collector/Assistant Collector 1st Class Sadar Unnao and Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow Division, Lucknow respectively declining the claim of the petitioner for mutation on the basis of an unregistered Will.
2. Shorn of details, necessary facts are that petitioner applied for mutation before the mutation Court on 1.12.1995 in respect of plot No. 652/1.292 hectare village-Murtazanagar, Tehsil-Sadar Unnao on the ground that original tenure holder Smt. Chandan had executed the Will on 26.10.1995. Daughters of the deceased Smt. Chandan filed objection. Naib Tehsildar vide order dated 14.3.2014 rejected the claim of the petitioner doubting the genuineness of the Will and ordered the mutation in the name of Smt. Neelam, daughter of Ramawati on the basis of succession in accordance with Section 174 of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act. An appeal was filed against the order dated 14.3.2014 passed by Naib Tehsildar, Sadar Unnao, which was dismissed by A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.