SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 446

AJAI LAMBA, AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN
NAFEESA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.K. Sharma for the Petitioner; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The question raised by way of this petition is as to whether a witness, of his own has the right to approach a Magistrate to record his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.; and whether such Magistrate is under a legal obligation to record the statement of such witness under Section 164 Cr.P.C., when investigation in a criminal offence is going on?

2. The petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the investigating agency to record statement of the petitioner under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in open Court.

3. It has been pleaded in the petition that the petitioner lodged false F.I.R. on the basis of fabricated facts under pressure from her husband, bearing Case Crime No. 358 of 2014, under Sections 376 and 506 I.P.C., police station Laharpur, district Sitapur (First Information Report dated 9th September, 2014, Annexure-1). It has further been pleaded that the petitioner is an illiterate person with no knowledge of law. The petitioner did not know the accused.

4. In paras-9 to 11 of the petition, it has been pleaded that under threat of her husband and the investigating officer of the case, the petitioner gave her statement under Section 16

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top