SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 943

MANOJ MISRA
SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
A.B. Singh for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Manoj Misra, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicant; the learned A.G.A. for the State; and perused the record.

2. The instant application has been filed seeking quashing of proceeding of Complaint Case No. 3099 of 2014 pending in the Court of A.C.J.M (II), Allahabad, which has been instituted on an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘D.V. Act, 2005’) seeking various benefits/protection order under Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the D.V. Act, 2005.

3. Application under Section 12 of the D.V. Act, 2005 has been filed by the opposite party No. 2 alleging that she was married to the applicant No. 1 on 7.12.2012 in accordance with Hindu Rites and Customs; that in her marriage, a large amount of money was spent and various articles were given; that the opposite parties i.e. the applicants herein were not satisfied and they raised demand for a car; that in connection with the said demand, she was harassed and even beaten; and finally on 28.12.2012, she was driven out of her matrimonial home whereas her jewellery articles, etc. were retained by the applicants herein. In her application she


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top